The new anti-spam Act joins the ranks of "something must be done, something has been done" cosmetic legislation that intimidates the innocent and does little to protect victims, like the spanking and dog chipping Acts.
The Department of Internal Affairs gains another content control role to join their censorship enforcement duties, and one wonders if they'll be the home of the election speech suppression.
But what will be the benefit of the anti-spam bill?
At best, compliance by NZ senders of email. That's worth the trouble?
What does it mean to the receiver? Nothing, spam will continue to be sent from other jurisdictions.
In any case, the reason none of this has been on my radar is that I don't suffer from spam. GMail effectively solves the problem for me without the need of Nanny State to stop all those bad senders. It is the only way.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Stuff
Month Archive
This Month
Categories
Login
|
Comments
Re: Anti-spam Bill
by
Anonymous
on Thu 23 Aug 2007 08:14 PM NZST | Permanent Link
as an ISP I will be signing up to this. Colleagues whose views I completely respect re email say it's ok.
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: Weblogs that reference this article:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||